'Shark Week' ready to shred 'Sharknado'

TV

Rob Owen TODAY contributor

27 minutes ago

Jeff Kurr / Discovery Channel

Discovery's "Return of Jaws" program features a shark cam that tracks these predators of the oceans, including great white sharks off Cape Cod.

If you?re not among the ?Shark Week? faithful, it?s easy to wonder: How many TV shows can possibly be made about sharks before this programming event threatens to jump the shark? After all, Discovery is kicking off its 26th year of shark-centered programming on Aug. 4.

But recent buzz about the cheesy Syfy movie ?Sharknado? proves there?s an unending appetite for shows that star these predators of the seas. The campy made-for-TV flick starring Ian Ziering and Tara Reid debuted to just 1.4 million, but repeated airings have drawn more and more viewers, with the third delivering 2.1 million sets of eyeballs.

But compared to the sensation that is Discovery's "Shark Week," that's peanuts.

?It?s our biggest week of the year and brings in a lot of people who are not your core, common Discovery viewers,? Nancy Daniels, executive vice president of production and development for the network told TODAY.com. ?It?s a pop culture phenomenon people talk about.?

Ratings for "Shark Week" 2012 in the 25-54 demo were 39.6 percent higher than the network's prime-time average. The premiere event also reeled in more than 21 million cumulative viewers, according to Discovery. In addition to high ratings, the TV event also blew up on social media last year, with 2.6 million @SharkWeek tweets and 17.5 million people reached on Facebook.

"Shark Week," which kicked off in 1988, has since featured more than 150 shark-centric programs. This year, Discovery will add 11 more to the list, including, "Megalodon: The Monster Shark That Lives," about a search for a species thought to be extinct; "Return of Jaws," which features a robot submarine that tracks the deadly fish; "Voodoo Sharks," about bull sharks in the Louisiana bayou; and more.

Of the new offerings, Daniels said she?s especially excited about ?Megalodon.?

?For years we?ve found teeth of megalodon and we know they used to exist and we think they might still exist in ?Megaladon,? ? she said.

If it sounds like the cheesy Animal Planet programs about mermaids, ?I think you might need to watch it to check it out,? Daniels teased.

This year's "Shark Week" will also feature a first for the network: ?Shark After Dark,? a late-night talk show hosted by comedian Josh Wolf, best known for his regular appearances on ?Chelsea Lately.?

The live, one-hour show will be ?shark-centric? with shark experts as guests, Wolf told TODAY.com, but it will also feature celebrity guests, including ?Sharknado?s? Reid.

Launching a late-night talk show on Discovery is something network executives had been considering before settling on testing the chum-infested waters during ?Shark Week.? Daniels said ?Shark After Dark? will serve as a learning experience for the network as it considers a more permanent late-night program.

?Shark After Dark? will include some mentions of the night?s prime-time shows and previews of the next night?s offerings, but Wolf said it?s not a recap show like other after-shows. (Think AMC's "Talking Dead.")

?I?m gonna assume people tuning in have just watched ?Shark Week? so it?s only smart to comment on it,? Wolf said. Besides, he?s a fan of shark shows too: ?I?m one of those guys who?s always been obsessed with watching it.?

Wolf said he gets geared up for ?Shark Week? each year, but he?s hesitant to actually swim with sharks.

He?s not alone in his armchair enthusiasm. By mid-July, Twitter was lighting up with anticipation:

Discovery jump-started interest in ?Shark Week? this year with a promotional campaign that showed a shark snatching Snuffy the Seal as he was being returned to the ocean. (Slogan: ?It?s a bad week to be a seal.?)

Daniels credited Lara Richardson, Discovery?s senior vice president of marketing, for coming up with a campaign that plays off the frequent ?Shark Week? image of sharks breaching the ocean?s surface to chomp on seals. (Daniels revealed what viewers often see on ?Shark Week? are sharks attacking fake, decoy seals dragged behind boats in an effort to capture dramatic footage.)

The spot shocked some viewers with how dark it was, but it did the trick in drawing attention to "Shark Week" 2013. Just one month after the spot premiered in late June, the video already had more than 1.3 million views on YouTube.

As for competing networks trying to steal Discovery?s shark thunder, Daniels said she?s not concerned.

?(Syfy) figured out something we?ve known for a long time: Sharks are awesome and people love sharks,? she said. ?('Sharknado') just reaffirmed what we do every year for ?Shark Week.? ?

Source: http://www.today.com/entertainment/shark-weeks-ready-shred-sharknado-it-returns-26th-year-6C10809668

Costa Rica Earthquake sandra fluke costa rica Earthquake Costa Rica Clinton speech Michael Strahan Griselda Blanco

Forbes has ranked Seattle as the most miserable sports city in the US; bonus poi...

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://www.facebook.com/SeattlePublicLibrary/posts/10151518576136339

zimmerman derek fisher lyrid meteor shower hippocrates andrew breitbart penguins the band

Zimbabwe: Mugabe declared winner in disputed vote

HARARE, Zimbabwe (AP) ? Zimbabwe's electoral panel on Saturday declared that longtime President Robert Mugabe had won re-election by a landslide, a result that could exacerbate tensions in the country, where the 89-year-old's chief rival and former coalition partner has accused him of poll-rigging.

Mugabe seemed set to strengthen his hold over Zimbabwe after the state Election Commission said his party won 158 of the 210 parliament seats. That gives it a two-thirds majority in the legislature ? enabling it to amend a recently approved constitution that provides for democratic reforms.

Challenger Morgan Tsvangirai's party, which had gambled that a high turnout in its favor would overcome any alleged fraud in the vote, captured 50 seats and two went to independent candidates.

According to the results, Mugabe won 61 percent of the vote, compared to 33 percent for Tsvangirai, who had been prime minister in a tense power-sharing deal with the president. Officially, Mugabe, who has been in power for 33 years, gets another five-year term in office.

Tsvangirai rejected the results as fraudulent and called for fresh elections. He urged a peaceful response to the alleged massive rigging by Mugabe's ZANU-PF party, which has the muscle of the security forces to deter any groundswell of street protests.

In contrast to an election marked by deadly attacks in 2008, the vote on Wednesday was mostly peaceful and African poll monitors, while expressing some concern about reported irregularities, seemed mostly relieved that it was not violent.

Britain and the United States were more forceful in their criticism of the voting process, though Mugabe has based his career in part on sparring with Western powers and there is little chance their disapproval will sway him.

That leaves the Zimbabwean opposition with few options for countering Mugabe, who presides over a country that still has economic problems but enjoys some measure of stability compared to a period of soaring inflation years ago.

Tsvangirai said his Movement for Democratic Change party has in its possession evidence of massive rigging by Mugabe's party in the just-ended polls and will challenge results from Wednesday's voting in court.

"People of Zimbabwe must be given another chance to participate in a free, fair and credible election. They have been shortchanged by a predetermined election," he said. He added that his party will not "participate in any government institutions" in protest but stopped short of saying it will boycott its reduced seats in the Harare parliament.

Mugabe's loyalist army and police have set up security posts in Harare on Saturday, apparently in case there are any protest demonstrations.

"We are rejecting the results because they are fraudulent," Tsvangirai said. "We will go back to our people. Our people are the ones hurting. Our people are disciplined. We don't want a violent resolution to this crisis."

He said a complete audit is needed of the shambolic lists of registered voters, which were made available to the parties only at the time of the election.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said in a statement that the election process was "deeply flawed" because of irregularities in the voters' roll, unequal access of the parties to state media, a lack of political reforms as mandated by the constitution, and other problems. He cited "the balance of evidence," although the United States was barred from monitoring the vote.

"The people of Zimbabwe should be commended for rejecting violence and showing their commitment to the democratic process," Kerry said. "But make no mistake: in light of substantial electoral irregularities reported by domestic and regional observers, the United States does not believe that the results announced today represent a credible expression of the will of the Zimbabwean people."

British Foreign Secretary William Hague expressed "deep concern" over the election, saying the failure to share the voters' roll with political parties was a "critical flaw." Hague said that and other irregularities "call into serious question the credibility of the election."

"We note that some political parties have rejected the result on the basis of these irregularities," he said, without saying whether Britain endorsed their move. "We will need to examine what has happened and consider further reports from regional and local observer missions. In the meantime, it is important that all allegations of electoral violations are thoroughly investigated."

Tsvangirai's party lost several seats in its Harare urban strongholds by massive margins compared to their overwhelming victories in 2008.

In one Harare constituency, Tsvangirai's party won with 9,538 votes to 8,190 captured by Mugabe's party. In 2008, the same district voted for the MDC candidate, Tendai Biti, by about 8,300 ballots against Mugabe's 2,500 votes.

Independent monitors have charged that as many as 750,000 voters were prevented from casting their ballots on Wednesday because of irregularities in voters' lists. They also allege that thousands of unregistered voters were allowed to vote.

The continent-wide African Union and regional monitors of the Southern African Development Community, or SADC, have generally endorsed the elections as peaceful. But they have expressed misgivings over how voting numbers might have been manipulated and have demanded a full account of voter numbers from the official state election body before passing their final judgment on whether the polls were free, fair and credible.

___

AP Writer Raphael Satter in London contributed to this report.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/zimbabwe-mugabe-declared-winner-disputed-vote-205240158.html

liam hemsworth miss canada justin bieber boyfriend marianas trench camille grammer camille grammer us supreme court

Chinese automaker shamelessly copies Volkswagen Taigun Concept

Unheard-of Chinese automaker Jiangsu Lake Motors is preparing a 99 percent copy of the Volkswagen Taigun Concept.

They say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery but this is just too much. You are looking at a car created by Jiangsu Lake Motors which is currently known simply as the "SUV". The real VW Taigun won't be out until 2016 but a very similar design will probably be seen on Chinese streets a lot sooner.

These photos are actually from a patent application and show virtually the same styling, including the alloy design (albeit with significantly slimmer tires). The main difference between the two can be seen at the rear doors where the "SUV" gets normal door handles.

This latest patent application comes after a string of China-made copy/paste models, including the recent Lamborghini Urus lookalike from Sichuan Yema and the C-Class impersonator known as the Brilliance BS6.

Source: http://www.worldcarfans.com/113080261026/chinese-automaker-shamelessly-copies-volkswagen-taigun

After Christmas Sales 2012 Charles Durning Webster Ny Mcdonalds Restaurants Open on Christmas Day santa tracker happy holidays

Federal judge who clears NCAA players to sue EA Sports is BYU alum

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday that a group of former college athletes led by onetime Arizona State quarterback Sam Keller could proceed with their lawsuit against EA Sports for ?stealing? their likenesses and physical attributes.

Judge Jay Bybee, a BYU alumnus, authored the majority opinion. Per the San Francisco Chronicle, Bybee wrote, ?"EA's use does not qualify for First Amendment protection as a matter of law because it literally re-creates Keller in the very setting in which he has received renown. Given that 'NCAA Football' realistically portrays college football players in the context of college football games, the district court was correct in concluding that EA cannot prevail as a matter of law."

Courthouse News Service's Annie Youderian wrote, ?Keller's lawsuit is similar to the antitrust class action filed in 2009 by former UCLA basketball star Edward O'Bannon. He accused EA and the NCAA of conspiring to dupe college athletes into signing away their rights to profit from their own images.?

?The lawsuits are part of a broader legal campaign that, if successful, could force the National Collegiate Athletic Association to tweak its longstanding rule that college athletes can't profit from their celebrity,? Joe Palazzolo reported Thursday for the Wall Street Journal. ?Electronic Arts pays the Collegiate Licensing Co., the NCAA's licensing arm, to use school and team names, uniforms and even fight songs. But the company doesn't compensate college players.

?The NCAA declined to comment. ? It announced in July that it won't renew its contract with EA due to the ?current business climate and costs of litigation.??

Email: jaskar@desnews.com

Source: http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865584001/Federal-judge-who-clears-NCAA-players-to-sue-EA-Sports-is-BYU-alum.html

joba chamberlain new york mega millions jetblue jetblue michelle malkin october baby sugarland

FDA defining what "gluten free" means on packages

WASHINGTON (AP) ? A label that reads "gluten free" will now mean the same thing for all food, regardless of which kind you buy.

After more than a six-year delay, the Food and Drug Administration has set a new standard for labels that will make shopping easier for consumers on gluten-restricted diets. Until now, the term "gluten free" had not been regulated, and manufacturers made their own decisions about what it means.

Under an FDA rule announced Friday, products labeled "gluten free" still won't have to be technically free of wheat, rye and barley and their derivatives. But they will have to contain less than 20 parts per million of gluten.

That amount is generally recognized by the medical community to be low enough so that most people who have celiac disease won't get sick if they eat it.

People who suffer from celiac disease don't absorb nutrients well and can get sick from the gluten found in wheat and other cereal grains. Other countries already have similar standards.

Celiac disease affects up to 3 million Americans. It causes abdominal pain, bloating and diarrhea, and people who have it can suffer weight loss, fatigue, rashes and other long-term medical problems. Celiac is a diagnosed illness that is more severe than gluten sensitivity, which some people self-diagnose.

Only a very small number of people wouldn't be able to ingest the amount of gluten that will be allowed under the new rule, FDA officials said.

"Adherence to a gluten-free diet is the key to treating celiac disease, which can be very disruptive to everyday life," FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg said. "The FDA's new 'gluten-free' definition will help people with this condition make food choices with confidence and allow them to better manage their health."

The new FDA rule also would ensure that foods with the labels "no gluten," ''free of gluten," and "without gluten" meet the definition. Manufacturers will have a year to comply, though the FDA urged companies to meet the definition sooner.

Ten years ago, most people had never heard of celiac disease. But awareness and diagnosis of the illness has exploded in recent years. It's not entirely clear why ? some researchers say it was under-diagnosed; others say it's because people eat more processed wheat products like pastas and baked goods than in past decades, and those items use types of wheat that have a higher gluten content.

Many companies that market gluten-free foods already meet the standard. But Andrea Levario of the American Celiac Disease Alliance said the federal guidelines will cut down on painstaking shopping for those who suffer from celiac disease.

Levario said that wheat must be labeled on food packages but that barley and rye are often hidden ingredients in food. The standard will also ensure that companies can't label products "gluten-free" even if they are cross-contaminated from other products made in the same manufacturing facility. She said shopping can be like "playing Russian roulette" for people who have celiac.

"This will eliminate confusion for the consumer and will cut down on calls to companies to try and determine whether their products are safe and gluten free," she said.

Michael Taylor, FDA deputy commissioner for foods, said the rule originally proposed during the George W. Bush administration was delayed because the agency was evaluating what standard was correct.

"We wanted to do a careful scientific assessment of the data and the range of sensitivities," Taylor said.

Congress originally directed the FDA to set the standards in 2004 as part of a larger law that required food packaging to list major allergens. Rep. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., originally introduced a bill calling for the standards in 1999. She praised the FDA rules and called them "a long time coming."

In the decade since Congress considered the standards, gluten-free foods have become big business. Millions of people are buying the foods because they say they make them feel better, even if they don't have celiac disease. Americans spent more than $4 billion on gluten-free foods last year, according to the American Celiac Disease Alliance, and a major manufacturing survey issued this week suggested that the niche industry is giving an economic boost to the food industry overall.

One of the largest manufacturers of gluten free foods, Boulder Brands, said it has been seeing double-digit growth in sales and is looking at expanding into bigger markets. The company's brands, Glutino and Udi's, already meet the new standards.

"We expect the new regulations to impact sales in a positive way as consumers can feel more confident in their gluten free choices," said T.J. McIntyre, executive vice president of the company.

__

Follow Mary Clare Jalonick on Twitter at http://twitter.com/mcjalonick

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/fda-defining-gluten-free-means-packages-130020591.html

lamichael james acl earthquake los angeles unemployment 2012 nfl draft grades young justice d rose

"Applications to [New Mexico Law School] law school dip sharply"

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Source: www.legalethicsforum.com --- Thursday, August 01, 2013
Story at ABQ Journal. Excerpt: A steep decline in applications has the University of New Mexico?s School of Law re-evaluating its future while putting faculty expansion on hold, administrators say. The school, under the direction of new dean David Herring,... ...

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LegalEthicsForum/~3/-4WnVTRb3AY/applications-to-new-mexico-law-school-law-school-dip-sharply.html

rpi dst friends with kids pacific standard time northern mariana islands summer time coolio

Sex, Violence, and Autocomplete Algorithms

There go your plans to have Google help you out with your search for boob-related things.

Fuse

Warning: This article contains explicit language.

Autocomplete is one of those modern marvels of real-time search technology that almost feels like it?s reading your mind. Thanks to analyzing and mining what millions of other users have already searched for and clicked on, Google knows that when you start typing a query with a ?d,? you?re most likely looking for a dictionary. Besides the efficiency gains of not having to type as much, suggestions can be serendipitous and educational, spurring alternative query ideas. In the process our search behavior is subtly influenced by exposure to query possibilities we may not have considered if left to ourselves.

So what happens when unsavory things, perhaps naughty or even illegal, creep into those suggestions? As a society we probably don?t want to make it easier for pedophiles to find pictures of naked children or to goad the violently predisposed with new ideas for abuse. Such suggestions get blocked and filtered?censored?for their potential to influence us.

As Google writes in its autocomplete FAQ, ?we exclude a narrow class of search queries related to pornography, violence, hate speech, and copyright infringement.? Bing, on the other hand, makes sure to ?filter spam? as well as to ?detect adult or offensive content,? according to a recent post on the Bing blog. Such human choices set the stage for broadly specifying what types of things get censored, despite Google?s claims that autocompletions are, for the most part, ?algorithmically determined ? without any human intervention.?

What exactly are the boundaries and editorial criteria of that censorship, and how do they differ among search engines? More importantly, what kinds of mistakes do these algorithms make in applying their editorial criteria? To answer these questions, I automatically gathered autosuggest results from hundreds of queries related to sex and violence in an effort to find those that are surprising or deviant. (See my blog for the methodological detail.) The results aren?t always pretty.

Armed with a list of 110 sex-related words, gathered from the linguistic extremes of both academic linguists and that tome of slang the Urban Dictionary, I first sought to understand which words resulted in zero suggestions (which likely means the word is blocked). In the following diagram, you can see words blocked only by Google or Bing, and by both or neither. For example, both algorithms think ?prostitute? is just dandy, suggesting options for prostitute ?phone numbers? or ?websites.? They?re not about sexual deprivation: Bing is happy to complete searches for ?masturbate? and ?hand job.? Conspicuously, Bing does block query suggestions for ?homosexual,? raising the question: Is there such a thing as a gay-friendly search engine? In response, a Microsoft spokesperson commented that, ?Sometimes seemingly benign queries can lead to adult content,? and consequently are filtered from autosuggest. By that logic, it would seem that ?homosexual? merely leads to ?too much? adult content, causing the algorithm to flag and filter it.

Initially it would appear Google is stricter, blocking more sex-related words than Bing. But really they just have different strategies. Instead of outright blocking all suggestions for ?dick? as Google does, Bing will just scrub the suggestions so you only see the clean ones, like ?dick?s sporting goods.? Sometimes Bing will rewrite the query, pretending a dirty word was a typo instead. For instance, querying for ?fingering? leads to wholesome dinner suggestions for ?fingerling potato recipes,? and searching for ?jizz? offers suggestions on ?jazz,? for the musically minded searcher, of course. Both algorithms are pretty good about letting through more clinical terminology, such as ?vaginas,? ?nipples,? or ?penises.?

For something like child pornography, the legal stakes get much higher. According to Ian Brown and Christopher Marsden in their book Regulating Code, ?Many governments impose some censorship in their jurisdiction according to content that is illegal under national laws.? So it?s not entirely surprising that, in order to head off more direct government intervention, corporations like Google and Microsoft self-regulate by trying to scrub their autocomplete results clean of suggestions that lead to child pornography.

Source: http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2013/08/words_banned_from_bing_and_google_s_autocomplete_algorithms.html

school closings ariana grande gonzaga lyme disease temple university palm sunday Kids Choice Awards 2013

Total War: Rome II Gameplay Demo

Evan and T.J. recently sat down with Creative Assembly?s Al Bickham for a guided tour through the battlefields of the 4th century B.C. in Total War: Rome II. We explore the campaign map with its new mechanics, and jump into a real-time battle to defend a key road to Rome. All the while, we bombard our gracious host with questions about the new face of Total War.

Be sure to check out the new trailer for Rome II and our breakdown of the army tradition system.

Source: http://www.pcgamer.com/2013/08/01/total-war-rome-ii-gameplay-demo/

Mexico vs USA Harmony Korine Summly Human Rights Campaign bioshock infinite smokey robinson smokey robinson

30 percent of Iraq, Afghanistan veterans have mulled suicide: survey

By Bill Briggs, NBC News contributor

Nearly one third of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans have contemplated suicide, according to survey results?released Wednesday, underscoring the dark depths of a mental-health crisis that has gripped the U.S. military and the American veteran community in recent years.?

In addition, 45 percent of the 4,000-plus survey respondents said they know of an Iraq or Afghanistan veteran who has attempted suicide, reports the group behind the poll, Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA) ? the largest advocacy organization for men and women who served in the wars, representing about younger 170,000 veterans. Some 2.2 million Americans have been deployed to those countries. ?

"That 30 percent have considered suicide is a high number. But what I look at from the survey is: We have 43 percent of the respondents saying that they are not seeking mental-health care because of a perceived negative impact to their career," said?Jason Hansman, an Iraq veteran and now senior program manager for health at IAVA. ?

"Also, 80 percent of the?respondents?say they don't think the veterans are getting the care that they need. That speaks to the collective mental health of this community," Hansman added.?

Two of the most common post-war themes haunting Iraq and Afghanistan veterans include the massive disability-benefits backlog within the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs ? the entity designated to handle their health care ? and the estimated?20 percent?of those veterans who are struggling with symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.?

The Army, the branch with the largest portion of combat troops, reported July 18 that 134 soldiers ? including active-duty members, reserves and those in the National Guard ? had committed "potential" suicide through the end of May. (Some of those deaths remain under investigation and await official designation).

More stunning: The Army's suicide pace far outstrips the number of American troops killed in Afghanistan (52) through May: according to iCasualties.org, which tracks deaths in that war.

What's equally troubling to suicide-prevention experts is the high rate veterans who have mulled suicide while skipping treatment due to stigma, career fears or VA frustrations.?

"That number (30 percent) is higher than we should ever tolerate," said Alan L. Berman, executive director of the American Association of Suicidology (AAS). The organization strives to better understand and prevent suicide.

"As a society, we have to be concerned and it demands a response that is geared toward doing all possible to prevent thoughts from turning into action," Berman said.?

By contrast, 3.3 percent of the U.S. population over the age of 18 has considered suicide during the past 12 months, and 13.5 percent of American adults has weighed the option of killing themselves during their lifetime, according to two AAS studies that each involved about 5,000 participants. (Berman cautioned that comparing the suicide-ideation rate among veterans with that of the general population is tricky math given that most people who served in the recent wars tend to be under age 40 and suicide rates are higher among younger people).?

The good news, however, is that those 30 percent of veterans who acknowledged contemplating suicide are still alive, Hansman said.?

"Certainly, there's something stopping them from taking their life. That's due to education that organizations like IAVA are doing, and the education that the VA is doing to (promote) the veteran crisis hotline, where the number of calls has risen year-over-year and month-over-month," Hansman added.?

Still, only 37 percent of the ex-service members polled said they would call the VA's veteran crisis line ? 800-273-TALK (8255) ? if they were feeling suicidal.

"They don't want to say they're suicidal to a government hotline. Now, we know how that hotline runs. We trust it completely (in terms of) keeping veteran information confidential, how it will not get back into their service record or hurt their career," Hansman said. ?"But there is still that anxiety around talking to the VA or talking to the DOD about your issues."

Inside the military, there's also an old stigma that seeking mental-health help is a sign of weakness ? a sentiment both the VA and Pentagon are working to shatter.?

"It's not overt. Your commander is not telling you: 'Don't go to mental health (services) because you're going to hurt your career.' It's just something that gets passed down (from other troops)," Hansman said. "Everyone carries around a horror story, whether it's true or not, about a guy or girl they know that sought mental health help and their career was over.

"It's entrenched in the military but it's something that can be changed," he added. "Stigma can be overcome. It's going to take a lot of work. But I think we, as a nation, should be up to the task."

?

?

?

Source: http://feeds.nbcnews.com/c/35002/f/663306/s/2f673307/sc/39/l/0Lusnews0Bnbcnews0N0C0Inews0C20A130C0A70C310C197956130E30A0Epercent0Eof0Eiraq0Eafghanistan0Eveterans0Ehave0Emulled0Esuicide0Esurvey0Dlite/story01.htm

ron paul Cnn Electoral Map roseanne barr guy fawkes gary johnson gary johnson where do i vote